<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecting Design (thinking) to Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designingforexperience.com/2010/03/03/connecting-design-thinking-to-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designingforexperience.com/2010/03/03/connecting-design-thinking-to-marketing/</link>
	<description>A Holistic Approach to Design for People, Interaction, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:43:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaronh</title>
		<link>http://designingforexperience.com/2010/03/03/connecting-design-thinking-to-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>aaronh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingforexperience.com/?p=259#comment-592</guid>
		<description>@Dave
This is a very interesting perspective, and something I had forgotten about.  I&#039;ve worked just a little with web apps and I remember the client talking a lot about how they did A/B testing.  At Philips we don&#039;t have a lot in terms of online apps, but our new Directlife program does, so I think it may be valuable for me to speak with them.  Love to talk to you on Skype or if you&#039;re coming to CHI have dinner/drinks together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave<br />
This is a very interesting perspective, and something I had forgotten about.  I&#8217;ve worked just a little with web apps and I remember the client talking a lot about how they did A/B testing.  At Philips we don&#8217;t have a lot in terms of online apps, but our new Directlife program does, so I think it may be valuable for me to speak with them.  Love to talk to you on Skype or if you&#8217;re coming to CHI have dinner/drinks together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave R</title>
		<link>http://designingforexperience.com/2010/03/03/connecting-design-thinking-to-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingforexperience.com/?p=259#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Aaron, I really like where this thesis is going.  Very interesting / important topic.

I prefer the wording of the 1st one.   It implies that getting the information about people is  broader then studying people, which I think is is good because not all marketers (or designers)  do this.

I deal with this issue often at work and have a couple of thoughts that you might find useful.  I have worked with both desktop apps and web apps and I think web apps are really a game changer as marketing relates to XD.  


With online apps:

-It becomes blurry where marketing ends and the application begins.  They are pretty infused, especially with no credit card required apps that allow for a free trial.  For those 30 days are both providing an application and trying convince them to buy the product.

- Multivariate testing &amp; rapid iterations:  Because the sign-up of online apps can be measured and users can easily be re-directed to different marketing material, there is a ton of A/B testing by the marketers to learn which marketing leads to the most sign ups.  In many ways this allows for more of a design (thinking) approach.   For one of our products, the marketing page and sign up flow went through ~100 variations and a year of multivariate testing before we found a marketing approach we were happy with.   


Whoo.  Sorry for the brain dump, but it was something I have been dealing with at work and your post prompted me to get it out of my head.  Good luck with your thesis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, I really like where this thesis is going.  Very interesting / important topic.</p>
<p>I prefer the wording of the 1st one.   It implies that getting the information about people is  broader then studying people, which I think is is good because not all marketers (or designers)  do this.</p>
<p>I deal with this issue often at work and have a couple of thoughts that you might find useful.  I have worked with both desktop apps and web apps and I think web apps are really a game changer as marketing relates to XD.  </p>
<p>With online apps:</p>
<p>-It becomes blurry where marketing ends and the application begins.  They are pretty infused, especially with no credit card required apps that allow for a free trial.  For those 30 days are both providing an application and trying convince them to buy the product.</p>
<p>- Multivariate testing &amp; rapid iterations:  Because the sign-up of online apps can be measured and users can easily be re-directed to different marketing material, there is a ton of A/B testing by the marketers to learn which marketing leads to the most sign ups.  In many ways this allows for more of a design (thinking) approach.   For one of our products, the marketing page and sign up flow went through ~100 variations and a year of multivariate testing before we found a marketing approach we were happy with.   </p>
<p>Whoo.  Sorry for the brain dump, but it was something I have been dealing with at work and your post prompted me to get it out of my head.  Good luck with your thesis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
