Archive for the ‘Grad School’ Category

My 5 min Presentation on Serious Games

October 24th, 2007, posted in Grad School, HCI, Philosophy of Technology

Aaron’s Current Capstone Presentation – Google Doc or on SlideShare

So I had to finally present to my colleagues last night (as referenced by Dave RoedlRoyer’s post at the Interaction Culture Blog) and got some great feedback on several fronts. One interesting thing Sam Shoulders brought up was to compare educational TV to educational games. It may be interesting to take a look at the differences between production of let’s say any ol’ cartoon, like transformers, and say Dora the Explora (or are you supposed to spell explorere properly?). That may produce some interesting items.

Essentially what Dave was saying in his post is that all games are serious, and teach people something. The difference between a “serious game” and just a game is that it was designed with the intent to teach, and that was explicitly made part of the game. Keywords: intent, explicit. All games teach, although it may not be what people think.

Some people think violent video games teach people to be violent, making it into a causal relationship. Kid A plays GTA, GTA in turn causes that kid to be violent. Perhaps we can put it in terms of influence, or that it sends the message that certain things are OK. I don’t really know, but it’s pretty clear from the millions of people who have played very violent games like say Contra, Duke Nukem, or pretty much any of the early space games (space invaders, galaga et al) who haven’t become violent (yet?!) that there is more to this question.

What’s the take home message here? Everything we make as designers embed values, judgments, prejudice… in short we embed a piece of ourselves and our culture in everything we make.

What does this mean for us? My reaction to this is, Hey Aaron, be the best man you can be! So that when you make your next game that explicitly teaches, it will make the world a better place.

Grad student Executive Committee Nominations

October 15th, 2007, posted in Grad School

I have been nominated for both the Executive Chair and the Member-at-Large positions on the executive committee for the soon-to-be-named graduate student association in the department of Informatics.

As a nominee I’ve been asked to publicly say why what I want for the organization.

Here’s the Twitter/SMS version:
We have a unique chance with the remaking of AGIS to make INFO a better place for everyone especially all the grad students, let’s grab it!

Here’s the short version:

What do I hope to achieve through my service on the executive committee?
I believe that the actions, tone, and proper organization of the graduate student association will set a precedent, and will bring a new level of transparency of information, service, and connectedness to current, past, and future students with each other, the school, and the larger communities we practice in. As a friend said, whoever is executive chair needs to really make it their “thing.” I am making it “my thing” no matter what position of service you choose to have me in.

About me:
I’m a second year MSc student in HCI/D who is applying to PhD programs, including here at IU, for next year. My main research interests are the theory & philosophy of all the following (as well as their implied design & critique methodologies in those fields):Technology, HCI, Design, Games, Serious Games. I’ve been married for a little over 5 years now to my wonderful wife Vanessa who is a mom/opera singer. We have 2 young boys, Ezra & Micah (2yrs & 3 mos). If I had any spare time I would spend it playing WoW or Wii Sports, notice the IF at the beginning of the sentence.

——————————-

Here’s the extra long stuff:

Why do I care at all?
As a first year student and someone who was returning to school after a break, I didn’t know how things worked. I didn’t understand (and still don’t completely) how an academic school/department is structured, who controls what, what the committees are, who I vitally needed to get to know and talk to in the administration and staff. All I knew was that I could ask a Linda. Now there is only one Linda and we have Rachel, and for all you new students, you should already know and love these two fine ladies. They will help you any way they can. Often though, it is very helpful to understand what else is going on. I think that our association can bring a lot more transparency to how the school works, who’s in charge of what, and who you need to talk to, including alumni, and other students who have already been down the road you are now starting on.

Why am I accepting nominations for both Ex-Chair and Member at Large?
Put very simply I am passionate about making grad students’ lives better, and having our interests represented more fairly in the school and in the IU community at large. I enjoy the democratic way of doing things, and I respect that process, but given the fact I may not win one or the other I am keeping my hat in the ring for both positions so that I am almost certainly going to be able to be involved in a very meaningful way.

The long version: I want to make some kind of lasting impact on the school for good. There is a possibility that I will not return here for my PhD, and if that is the case then I need to do that now. What I want to do the most on the executive committee is to make our organization impactful and long-lasting. There was an organization that was in place a few years ago. Our program was smaller then, and the organization was less formal and organized. Unfortunately the officers last year of the organization chose not to, probably through omission while being busy on the job hunt, plan for the continuity of the organization. This has left us with nothing. We are not registered with IU as an official organization, we have very little if any representation to the school and it’s various committees. The large growth in our grad program started with my class has led to less communication and socializing between the programs, we need to change this. We need to have well developed programs to help prepare us for our future careers. We are in a unique position in a unique school, and that means we have a slightly different set of things to deal with when we go looking for jobs and to publish our research.

What will I do if I win both positions?
If there is no runner-up for the at-large position I would probably nominate a first year student, someone who can take the feeling of participation and community and power that will come with our organization this year into a future year or years. The cohesion and power of our association depends on everyone feeling like they have a say, and that their interests and concerns are represented, I would nominate someone who I think can do those kinds of things for all of the programs in our department

Dan Saffer does it again (or at least he did last year)

October 10th, 2007, posted in Grad School, HCI

That Dan Saffer–I like his work. I bought his book (or won it, I think, at a UPA event), and he had that review of Schoen, which was excellent. Now I see that he reviewed What Things Do by Peter-Paul Verbeek. Verbeek isn’t the easiest read, so having a nicely laid out and thorough review is a big plus in helping get through Erik’s Theory of HCI Design class.

Thanks Dan! You’re making my life easier & better, keep up the good work.

I am one of 7 people thinking of the philosophy of technology?

October 10th, 2007, posted in Grad School, HCI, Philosophy of Technology

As many know I am completing a MS in Human-Computer Interaction Design (or HCI/D for short) in the department of Informatics in the School of Informatics at Indiana University. I am also applying for several PhD programs for next year. Even though I have my short list of places to apply to, I still dabble in my searches for other programs when I have a few extra minutes.

Kevin Makice has thoughtfully defined Informatics and I think I agree with him. In the Masters program we are immediately taught most of the standard methods in what most people call UX or IX design (User eXperience & Interaction), but it is sometimes called usability, user-centered design, or more properly as I learned yesterday, human-centered design. What brought me to IU was the unique nature of the program and that I have a passion for making technology better for everyone, and that it can make our society better if used properly.

That being said however, as early as November or December of last year (sometime after my midterm in 501) I started to consider the value of our program to be “critical thinking about technology”. I have started to really think about the philosophy of technology lately, not that I’ve had a choice with my selection of theoretically and philsophically dense readings (thank you Jeff Bardzell & Erik Stolterman).

Take all of that background and then mix in this argument: Technology in the developed world, and even to large extent in the developing world is almost everywhere and has a hand in almost every aspect of our lives. Each of us use technology to change the world around us, whether that be to make a phone call and save ourselves from walking over and talking to someone or making fun videos on YouTube, this is the case. Now here’s the premise that many of you may disagree with; When we design and use technology we are implicitly forwarding or promoting a philosophy about what the world should be like. If that is true then some scholars should be making that philosophy explicit, and this should be a consideration when designing new tools, platforms etc for use.

I take this argument to be true and therefore started looking at the philosophy of technology, and thought to myself “surely there is a PhD program somewhere that focuses on the philosophy of technology.” NOPE, not a one. There are several great books out there, and like I said it’s being talked about in some of my classes, usually obiliquely, but I just thought that maybe I would see some courses being taught on the grad level somewhere on this, or perhaps a minor, or track within a program on this. Very few. I managed to find a course that was taught last spring at UNT on the philosophy of technology.

There MUST be scholars out there thinking about these issues, if there is anyone who knows about them, please point them my way!

Coming soon a resource page of books, articles and people, please contribute to it by commenting or emailing me aaronh (at) gmail [dot] com.

The first week is over

September 1st, 2007, posted in Grad School

Amazingly I’m still alive.   Really it hasn’t been that bad.  I’ve been agonizing about course selection for months, but more intensely the last few weeks.  It turns out I made some good choices (I may change my views on this as the semester progresses obviously).

What’s happening:

The Graduate Informatics Student Association is starting up, and I can’t wait to get it going.

I’m taking “Interaction Culture” with Jeff Bardzell, it’s exciting stuff, and Jeff knows how to handle a class.  Fun thing is, we have a course blog.  It looks very promising indeed.

I’m taking “HCI Design Theory” with Erik Stolterman, Erik rules, and is very quotable.  I’m sure you’ll see some tweets about a few of these.  All I can say is that the second day he mentioned the word’s “Utlimate Particular” and “Aristotle.”  I’m feeling pretty comfortable at this stage, but I’m sure I’ll be out of my depth really quick.

I presented to stakeholders the current status on the Games Analysis Database (what’s with the capitals, yet I am compelled to use them).  I think it went reasonably well, I honestly just want to see the project move forward.

I tried to go visit President McRobbie, but had to leave for my aforementioned  presentation before it was my turn.  Hopefully I’ll be able to meet with him in the next month.

I will hopefully have something a little more enlightening to say, but in the meantime here is a link to some of the places where I have some shared items:

Google Reader 

Google Notebook